Reminder: 2014 BIO DDIG Deadline Thursday Oct 9

The DEB (all clusters) and IOS (Behavioral Systems Cluster only) due date for Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants (DDIG) is Thursday, 9 October 2014.

Submissions must be received by 5:00 PM (your local time) on Thursday, 9 October 2014.

This is the same scheduled deadline (2nd Thursday in October) as last year.

Don’t be confused by last year’s extended deadline caused by the government shutdown. Be aware of the correct due date and don’t miss your window to apply!

If you are planning to submit:

Please be sure all of the required paperwork and certifications (especially the “statement that the student has advanced to candidacy for a Ph.D., signed and dated by the department chairperson, graduate dean, or similar administrative official”) will be ready for the submission. Also, please make sure your organizational representative (usually, the Sponsored Research Office (SRO)) is aware of the actual due date to avoid missing the deadline.

Resources-

DDIG solicitation (submission instructions): http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13568/nsf13568.htm

DDIG Website (with program contacts): http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5234

Our recent series on DDIG: part 1, part 2, part 3

 

Two New Dear Colleague Letters Promote International Collaboration in DEB

We are excited to announce two new Dear Colleague Letters (DCLs) in the Division of Environmental Biology.

When DEB researchers pursue international research collaborations, a common challenge is for both parties to secure concurrent funding. As explained in a previous DEBrief blog post on international collaboration, DEB can fund investigators through US-based institutions, however, DEB cannot fund investigators through foreign institutions. If both collaborators apply for grants independently to their respective country’s funding agency, there is a risk that one or both sides will not be funded. Some call this challenge double jeopardy.

International agreements between funding agencies can help to mitigate this type of  challenge. In lieu of each funding agency conducting a concurrent and independent review of the proposal, agencies can work together to streamline the review process into one mutually approved review. A single review process minimizes the risks associated with double jeopardy. If a jointly submitted proposal is selected for funding, then each country will pay for its own researcher’s component of the project. By aligning our funding decisions with those of other science funding agencies, we are able to extend the reach of our investigators’ high quality, cutting-edge science.

The two new Dear Colleague Letters are separate activities that have important differences. We strongly encourage interested investigators to carefully read the relevant Dear Colleague Letter and its associated program solicitation. DEB will begin accepting these US-Israel or US-UK collaborative proposals for the 2015 core solicitation preliminary proposal deadline of January 23, 2015.

It is important to recognize that these Dear Colleague Letters ARE NOT solicitations with dedicated budget lines (e.g. they do not describe new opportunities for funding). These DCLs simply announce a new way for international collaborative proposals to go through existing peer review mechanisms. We’re trying to make international collaboration routine as much as possible by reducing unnecessary barriers.

 

BSF DEAR COLLEAGUE LETTER

BSF_LogoThe US – Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) is a science-funding agency that supports collaborative research between United States and Israeli scientists. The projects they fund cover a wide range of basic and applied scientific fields. The DEB-BSF Dear Colleague Letter strives to enhance collaborations between US and Israeli scientists specifically in the realm of environmental biology.

NERC DEAR COLLEAGUE LETTER

NERC_LogoThe Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) is one of the seven councils within the Research Councils United Kingdom (RCUK). It is the UK’s largest funder of independent environmental science, training, and innovation. The goal of the DEB-NERC Dear Colleague Letter is to reduce current barriers that investigators face when working with UK collaborators in the field of environmental biology and to promote US and UK science partnership.

Interested investigators are strongly encouraged to email in advance of submitting a proposal.

For questions on the BSF-DCL, please email: NSFDEB-BSF@nsf.gov

For questions on the NERC-DCL, please email: NSFDEB-NERC@nsf.gov

 

What’s your DEB Story?

Sometimes, it can be hard to fit what you want to tell us into your annual report. Other times, the coolest results, recognition of important research outcomes, and broader impacts only come to fruition in the years after a grant was closed and the final reports compiled.

We’re interested in unearthing the dark data on award outcomes. Help us tell the full story of DEB funding: from personal experiences to news-making discoveries, we want to hear from you. Comment, email us, or schedule a time to talk with us to share your experiences.

Non-exhaustive list of examples:

  • Any part of the project that you couldn’t fit in your reports and want us to know about.
  • Updates on how research on a grant has influenced student careers.
  • Publications that have become modern classics.
  • Awards and recognitions.
  • Institutional legacies of innovative programs.
  • Follow-up or translational research that took your results in unexpected directions.

We’re always looking to highlight the results of research spending to illustrate the breadth of impacts of past and current awards. Short summary stories of award outcomes are passed to NSF’s Public Affairs team and may wind up on research.gov. Your responses can help us highlight the many ways in which DEB awards serve to promote the progress of science, support education, and contribute to national well-being.

DEB Numbers: CAREER Submission Data

This is a quick numbers post while we in DEB pivot from summer research and meeting outreach to fiscal closeout and autumn (full proposal) panel mode.

CAREER proposals in BIO were due on July 21, 2014. These proposals will be reviewed this fall and become part of the FY 2015 decision-making process. In this post, we take a look at the trends in submission of CAREER proposals through the current competition. We aren’t looking at funding rates or outcomes – those are beyond the scope of today’s post.

If you have no clue what a CAREER proposal is, skip to this short primer.

DEB CAREER Submissions Trend

The CAREER program is a long-standing, foundation-wide opportunity for junior faculty. In DEB, CAREER proposals can provide eligible PIs an additional submission above and beyond the 2 allowed annually in the core programs.

Some DEB staff were concerned that we would see a substantial increase in CAREER submissions after the launch of the preliminary proposal process for the core programs. The reasoning was that CAREER-eligible junior faculty who were not invited to submit a full proposal would submit a CAREER instead. Alternatively, others pointed out that a competitive CAREER proposal differs substantially from a regular research proposal and that one does not simply flip a project idea from one to the other. Going in to the preliminary proposal system, it was an open question as to how CAREER submissions would respond.

CareerTrend1

Between 2002 and 2007, we received 40-60 CAREER proposals per year. There was rapid growth from 2008 to 2009 and 2010, well before the preliminary proposal process was launched, but that trend has not continued over the 5 subsequent deadlines. There is a jump in 2013, the first CAREER deadline after the switch to preliminary proposals, but that level has not been maintained. It appears that, 3 years in, we have not experienced a large shift of DEB proposals into the CAREER mechanism. Anecdotally, a few comments we’ve heard suggest that CAREER proposals continue to be seen as prestigious awards with high expectations at the review stage so many eligible PIs may be hesitant to apply. Supposing this view is sufficiently widespread it could easily suppress the numbers of PIs who would otherwise turn to this program after or instead of a core program submission.

Elsewhere in BIO

While there was little change in CAREER submission numbers after the switch to the preliminary proposal system in DEB, the story is somewhat different in IOS (which instituted preliminary proposals at the same time) and MCB (which instituted a single deadline and PI submission limit of 1). Both of these Divisions also started from a very different place than DEB with respect to CAREER submissions. IOS and MCB received larger numbers of CAREER proposals than DEB in the years immediately prior to their respective review process changes and there are less tangible but important cultural differences in community expectations and approach to CAREER proposals. MCB was coming down from a submission peak (217 CAREER proposals) in 2006 and IOS was at a plateau ~110 following substantial submission growth in the early 2000s.CareerTrend2

*The 2015 numbers may be revised if some submissions are returned as incomplete or out of compliance.

Both IOS and MCB experienced actual and proportionately larger initial jumps in CAREER submissions post-2012 than DEB. And, neither IOS nor MCB experienced a drop of similar magnitude to DEB during the second or third year since their solicitation changes. It’s not clear why the reaction in these two Divisions differed so much from the DEB communities. Potential reasons include: larger communities with larger potential for increases, influx of PIs from the biomedical community seeking funding, and differing perceptions and expectations for CAREER submissions relative to regular proposals.

Summary

Even though three years is a short run, CAREER submissions from 2013 onward in each of the three Divisions appear to be relatively stable. Concern about overwhelming growth in CAREER submissions has not been borne out. However, it is unclear why numbers went up and remained there in MCB and IOS but not DEB and what that means for us. Are DEB PIs and/or reviewers much more selective as to what they will put forward for a CAREER award? Do the demographics differ between the fields enough that we were already saturated with CAREER submissions while the other Divisions were not? Or is the variation stochastic? If anyone has data that might shed some light on these questions, we’d be happy to know.

CAREER primer:

CAREER is shorthand for the NSF-wide Faculty Early Career Development Program. The CAREER program is distinguished from other NSF opportunities by being exclusively for pre-tenured faculty and specifically focused on excellent educational aspects integrated with an outstanding research program. In addition to being considered a prestigious award in its own right, receipt of a CAREER award is a prerequisite of eligibility for the Presidential Early Career Awards for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE).

CAREER program submissions have a single annual deadline in mid-to-late July (exact date varies by directorate) and are reviewed by the most relevant disciplinary program. In DEB, CAREER proposals are taken to review in our fall full proposal panels, alongside invited full proposals, OPUS, and RCN submissions, and co-review proposals as we have previously illustrated. While not the normal practice in DEB, it is fairly common across NSF to have panels exclusively for CAREER proposals in programs where there are large numbers of CAREER submissions and/or no other close deadlines. [back to top]

DEB Live! 2014: ESA in Sacramento, 10-15 August

DEB is coming to the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America in Sacramento, California.

We are expanding our formal presence at this year’s meeting by:

(1) Holding our regular lunchtime “Town Hall” session on Tuesday, August 12 from 11:30-1:15 pm in room 202 of the Sacramento Convention Center.

(2) Hosting a Table in the Exhibit Hall  with general information about NSF and the Biological Sciences Directorate, including funding opportunities in and beyond DEB (as of press time we expect to be Table B). Expect 1 or 2 representatives at the table throughout the day.

Our ESA 2014 Table. Stop by and say "hi."

Our ESA 2014 Table. Stop by and say “hi.”

(3) Program Officers will also generally be available for questions at the NSF exhibit table during the late-afternoon poster sessions: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday from 4:30-6:30 pm.

(4) If you wish to arrange a special time to meet with one of these folks you can contact them by email.

 

Below are individuals from NSF who will be in attendance at the meeting:

Penny Firth, Division Director
Division of Environmental Biology
pfirth@nsf.gov

Alan Tessier, Deputy Division Director (Acting)
Division of Environmental Biology
atessier@nsf.gov

Henry Gholz, Program Officer
Division of Environmental Biology, Ecosystem Science Cluster
hgholz@nsf.gov

Peter Alpert, Program Officer
Division of Environmental Biology, Population and Community Ecology Cluster
palpert@nsf.gov

Linda Deegan, Program Officer
Division of Environmental Biology, Ecosystem Science Cluster
ldeegan@nsf.gov

Betsy Von Holle, Program Officer
Division of Environmental Biology, Population and Community Ecology Cluster
mvonholl@nsf.gov

John Schade, Program Officer
Division of Environmental Biology, Ecosystem Science Cluster
jschade@nsf.gov

Alan Wilson, Program Officer
Division of Environmental Biology, Population and Community Ecology Cluster
aewilson@nsf.gov

John Adamec, Program Analyst
Division of Environmental Biology
jadamec@nsf.gov

Cheryl Dybas, Public Affairs Officer
NSF Office of Legislative and Public Affairs
cdybas@nsf.gov

 

NSF.gov Web Survey: How well is the official site meeting your information needs?

There’s a survey up for public input/comments related to the material and organization of sites on the official NSF.gov homepages for Directorates and Divisions (e.g., the BIO Directorate and DEB’s Division page).

From the NSF.gov website management:

Dear Colleagues,

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is working to improve our web site, NSF.gov. We are initially focusing on the pages that provide Directorate- and Division-specific information. NSF is divided into seven Directorates that support broad areas of science and engineering research and education. Each Directorate is divided into several Divisions, which focus on more specialized disciplines (see the NSF Organization List).

Help guide the future direction of the NSF web site by completing our online survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/nsfwebsitesurvey by August 19. It should take no more than 10 to 15 minutes to complete and is anonymous. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 3145-0215.

Thank you for your participation. We look forward to receiving your feedback on how our web site can serve you better.

DEB Live! 2014: Botany in Boise, 26-30 July

Botany 2014 will take place in Boise, Idaho from Saturday July 26 through Wednesday July 30.

There are several chances at this conference to interact with DEB and other NSF/BIO representatives.

  1. We will have an information booth in the Exhibit Hall, (#24 on the map).
  2. On Monday 7/28, we will be having a Lunch and Learn at the Exhibit booth from 12:00 – 1:30pm
  3. We will be available at the booth during the Poster Sessions on Monday evening from 5:30-7:00pm
  4. We are hosting a brown bag information session on Wednesday July 30 from 12:00 – 1:30pm at the Eyrie Room/Boise Center
  5. If you wish to arrange a special time to meet with one of the NSF attendees you can contact them by email.

 

Below are individuals from NSF who will be in attendance at the meeting:

Michele Dudash, Program Officer
Division of Environmental Biology, Evolutionary Processes Cluster
mdudash@nsf.gov

Simon Malcomber, Program Officer
Division of Environmental Biology, Systematic and Biodiversity Sciences Cluster
smalcomb@nsf.gov

Joe Miller, Program Officer
Division of Environmental Biology, Systematic and Biodiversity Sciences Cluster
jtmiller@nsf.gov

Roland Roberts, Program Officer
Division of Biological Infrastructure, Research Resources Cluster
rolrober@nsf.gov

Irv Forseth, Program Officer
Division of Integrative Organismal Systems, Physiological and Structural Systems Cluster
iforseth@nsf.gov